Scrutiny tonight

Tonight is another meeting of the Council’s Internal Scrutiny committee. Its name might induce sniggers in the occasional teenage boy, but its purpose is more serious. It is the only body scrutinising the work of the Council’s Cabinet, which is the group of top Councillors running Bury.

There’s a new system of scrutiny in Bury this year, and I don’t think it’s working very well at the moment. The way it should work is that the Cabinet make decisions which affect Bury, and we get to take a look at them after, or preferably before, they’ve been taken to ensure that everything is being done properly and in the interests if Bury. Obviously we might disagree with the end decision, and it’s not necessarily about changing it, but it is certainly about giving Councillors of all political views a say.

Until last year there were about 5 scrutiny panels. They looked at lots of interesting, but often irrelevant, things. Now there’s just one, which is supposed to look at fewer things, all of them important.

Sadly, the change in arrangements has coincided with the new “Strong Leader” model for the Council, which has changed the way that the Cabinet makes decisions. As a result, in the three months which we are to scrutinise tonight, only a handful of decisions have apparently been made, very few of them important.

Hopefully tonight we will discuss ways to improve the situation, as it’s evidently not right that the Cabinet have made so few decisions when, in reality, the Council is doing lots which affects the borough, like making big financial decisions about cuts.

I am looking forward to our discussion tonight and to ways of improving the situation. If you’ve really nothing better to do and don’t want to watch the last ever episode of The Bill, you can watch the drama unfold, as the meeting is open to the public and free to attend! At the Town Hall, tonight at 7!

Rick

2 Responses to “Scrutiny tonight”

  1. Jim M Says:

    Hi Richard,

    Perhaps you could find out about the Local Development Framework – just published on the authority of Cllr Dorothy Gunther.
    Subject of a letter in last weeks P&W Times. No one in Walmersley seems to know about the bit that cuts up the Green Belt for an industrial estate – even though it is in North Manor Cllr Gunther’s home turf !
    I guarantee that uproar will ensue when news hits the streets ! And leave Eric Pickles efforts to introduce ‘localism’ looking very sick hereabouts.

  2. Z Says:

    I keep meaning to get myself to one of these shindigs, but unfortunately I have an essay to write this evening. Scrutinize well!

Leave a Reply



Richard Baum

Photo of Richard Baum
27 Butterstile Close
Prestwich
Manchester
M25 9PH
T: 0161 773 1887 - 07811 987 894
E:
Last Local Elections - Lib Dems or Lab in St Marys

TWITTER

richardbaum

@graemelambert Well, dunno that the bill will be so huge. It's a magistrate's court case. Plus, he says he's not guilt so should be tried.

7 hours ago Reply

@graemelambert Yeah. If they can work out payment plans for poor to pay weekly why not rich to pay more? Maybe cos the crime's the same.

7 hours ago Reply

@nikhild23 he was also in the interrogation scene in basic instinct AND HAS BEEN WORKING FOR THE BBC!!!!!!!!! It is him. Him i tell you.

7 hours ago Reply

@nikhild23 wikipedia tells me that it was a dilophosaurus that killed the guy. And also, more pertinently, that his name is wayne knight.

7 hours ago Reply

@nikhild23 @herring1967 Obviously it's not him. He was eaten by a raptor.

7 hours ago Reply

Does anyone write letters any more? I like to send copious numbers of postcards, but find time for few letters. Shame. http://t.co/m7mnMd00

7 hours ago Reply

Did SAF put night nurse into the #mufc half time orange juice?

11 hours ago Reply

@manchester1 really? I didn't know that. Which version? Nat king cole?

12 hours ago Reply

@graemelambert i've often thought that fines should be income based e.g. 10% of weekly income rather than a set amount. Maybe impossible.

12 hours ago Reply

How much cheaper would my sky bill be if super sunday started at 15.59 and they got rid of the ludicrous build-up hyperbole?

13 hours ago Reply

Why is #superbowl xlvi not superbowl 46? Why the roman numerals?No problem with them,just seems a bit odd. Wonder if superbowl 50 will be L?

13 hours ago Reply

@OfficialMR2 What's the right way to say your name? Meeker? Micker? Myker? RT this and the answer and put thousands of minds at ease!

13 hours ago Reply

There is a chance, a growing chance, that i may not get dressed at all today. My ancient ancestors toiled in caves and hunted food for this.

14 hours ago Reply

Just discovered that there's another ACON in just one year's time! The toures will barely be home!

14 hours ago Reply

Not only are #mcfc unlucky to have the toures away for the ACON, but doubly so cos their country didn't get immediately knocked out #dembaba

14 hours ago Reply

#songifindmyselfrandomlysinging A Nightingale Sang In Berkeley Square.

15 hours ago Reply

@OfficialMR2 You can win. As a person in the public eye you have more influence than 99% of others. Say what you want but in the right way.

15 hours ago Reply

I can name every FA cup winner and runner up 1981-96, but very patchy 96-11. Is that cos i was younger or cos the FA cup is less valued?

15 hours ago Reply

@OfficialMR2 racism needs comments by everyone disgusted by it, not just the victims. Comments by the horrified bystanders are powerful too.

15 hours ago Reply

@OfficialMR2 great comments on the superbowl the other day micah. When did you play professional american football?

15 hours ago Reply

Administration