Richard Baum

Liberal Democrat Councillor for the St Mary’s ward of Bury Council

Congestion charge lie finally exposed as more transport funding now available

The Bury Lib Dem campaign against congestion charging was finally vindicated today when it was revealed that funding for public transport may be made available WITHOUT the need for congestion charging after all!

 

A costly and controversial referendum on congestion charging was held across Greater Manchester after local Councils in the city region were the only ones in the country to bid for funding contingent on congestion charging. The proposals were rejected by almost 80% of local voters after a campaign led by the Liberal Democrats in Bury. We called for funding for public transport without unfair road charges, but were told at the time that there was no alternative.

 Now, that lie has been exposed after it was revealed that money from the Transport Innovation Fund, which was conditional on charging schemes being introduced, will now be made available to all councils – including those in our region - with NO strings attached.

Unsurprisingly lots of people are annoyed that we were lied to, leading to an expensive consultation exercise, loads of money wasted promoting the original TIF bid, and a hugely costly referendum.

The Manchester Evening News reports how then transport secretary Geoff Hoon warned on the eve of the vote that unless Greater Manchester said ‘yes’ it it would get NO extra transport cash. Council chiefs in Greater Manchester – who also warned at the time there was ‘no plan B’ – have since come up with an alternative £1.5bn funding package based on borrowing against future council tax rises.

That will pay for many of the same improvements, including the extension of the Metrolink to Ashton Under Lyne, Oldham and Rochdale town centres, and

Manchester airport.
Now they will also be able to bid for money from TIF’s replacement - the ‘Urban Challenge Fund’, which will not be tied to congestion charging.

A ‘discussion paper’ released by the Department for Transport says TIF’s ‘weaknesses’ lay in its ‘too narrow focus’ on congestion and its ‘failure to win public acceptance for the more challenging proposals’.

 Greater

Manchesterwas the only area that was prepared to lodge a formal bid for TIF money – with other areas refusing because they did not want a congestion charge.The conditions attached to the new fund are much weaker. Towns and cities will only have to show they are ‘tackling’ congestion while improving safety, cutting carbon emissions and promoting healthier lifestyles.

Sean Corker, who led the campaign against the congestion charge as part of the pressure group Manchester Against Road Tolls, called for an inquiry into how much was spent promoting TIF.

Manchester city council dropped an absolute clanger on this,” he said. “We always said we would get the funding without congestion. Now it looks as though we were right.”

Remember, the Lib Dems were the only party in Bury against the TIF bid’s proposals for congestion from the start. The Tories signed the TIF proposals, and Labour campaigned publicly for them.

 

I knew we were right then, and we have been vindicated. It is now up to the government to properly fund public transport in the area without imposing unfair congestion charges on motorists.

 

Rick

have your say

Add your comment

:

: