Twitter ye not – Council bans meeting tweeting

Followers of mine on Twitter will have been expecting updates from the recent budget-setting Council meeting. Sadly, this wasn’t possible after a decision by the Conservative-run Council to ban Councillors from using mobile phones for any reason in meetings. As someone who tweets by text, this means no Twitter for me, and no updates for constituents.

 

At the start of the meeting, the Mayor informed us that anyone using a phone for any reason would be asked to leave the meeting because such activity is rude and discourteous. I respected the Mayor’s request, but I disagree with it.

 

It might seem like a sensible plan. After all, talking on phones during meetings is discourteous. Disrupting meetings using phones is discourteous. Wandering in and out of meetings to take calls is discourteous. I’ve seen all of these and worse at Council meetings, but the Mayor has never before been compelled to react.

 

If the Council thinks that mobile phone usage is wrong, that’s fine, but they’ve taken their time coming to that decision, and it’s odd that it’s come immediately after I became the first Councillor to start tweeting in Council meetings. Anyone would think the Mayor was put up to it by the Conservatives worried about me revealing their incompetence in real time!

 

I think that it’s perfectly possible to send text messages to Twitter (or anywhere else actually) whilst in meetings without either disrupting that meeting or concentrating any less than is required. Sending a tweet takes a few seconds, and is a fine way of keeping people informed on what’s going on. To ban it is not forward-looking or fair, in my view. Even if phones have been banned for another reason, they’ve chucked the baby out with the bathwater with a blanket ban.

 

At the last meeting of the Council, I sent various tweets. I don’t think they interrupted the meeting in any way, since the phone I was using was out of view and on silent. The tweets told constituents what was going on, and were even picked up by the Manchester Evening News who broadcast them live online alongside those of their own journalist. There was no difference between texting my thoughts and writing them down, except that by texting them to Twitter I was letting my constituents know about them there and then.

 

I managed to ask four questions and take part in two debates during that meeting as well, which is more than probably 45 of the other 50 Councillors in the Chamber. I see no reason to believe that my tweeting had any negative effect at all. In fact, I think we should be encouraging it so long as it doesn’t interfere with how the meeting goes on.

 

If the Council wants to tackle discourtesy in meetings, it needs to go further than stopping phones. It could start by banning pens, which are used frequently to doodle during debates, or to write down the thoughts that I’d otherwise be tweeting! It would then do well to talk to several high-ranking Councillors and ban them from talking, laughing or nodding off during questions and speeches. Many do that frequently.

 

Officers too would have to receive the Council’s ire, since they are not above reproach. One was the victim of one of my tweets, in fact, when I caught him mouthing “blah blah blah” during a Councillor’s speech and tweeted about it. I don’t know when my tweeting became ruder than his blah blah blah-ing, but apparently it is.

That type of stuff is far more discourteous than a bit of under-the-table texting. At the recent budget Council meeting both Cllr Trevor Holt (Lab) and I had to actually stop our speeches to allow for Conservative Councillors to stop talking, laughing and interrupting. The Council might want to look at that as well. It’s worse than tweeting in my view.

The behaviour of a number of Members is beyond discourteous and bordering on the rude. But worse is the frequent lack of complete answers given to simple questions and the Leader’s repetitive habit of leaping up and speaking without the Mayor’s permission throughout meetings. I’d like to see these things tackled too. They don’t add to democracy in this borough, and they put distance between the people and their Councillors. Tweeting does the opposite, and yet it’s this that’s been stopped because of the phone ban.

Sadly, I can’t see anything happening to tackle real discourtesy. By all means make it clear that phones should be on silent and nobody should take calls. I don’t want a speech interrupted by “Sex Bomb” blasting out as a ring tone. But there’s good stuff that can be done with phones, and I’d like to be able to do that.

Rick

Leave a Reply



Richard Baum

Photo of Richard Baum
27 Butterstile Close
Prestwich
Manchester
M25 9PH
T: 0161 773 1887 - 07811 987 894
E:
Last Local Elections - Lib Dems or Lab in St Marys

TWITTER

richardbaum

@graemelambert Well, dunno that the bill will be so huge. It's a magistrate's court case. Plus, he says he's not guilt so should be tried.

7 hours ago Reply

@graemelambert Yeah. If they can work out payment plans for poor to pay weekly why not rich to pay more? Maybe cos the crime's the same.

7 hours ago Reply

@nikhild23 he was also in the interrogation scene in basic instinct AND HAS BEEN WORKING FOR THE BBC!!!!!!!!! It is him. Him i tell you.

7 hours ago Reply

@nikhild23 wikipedia tells me that it was a dilophosaurus that killed the guy. And also, more pertinently, that his name is wayne knight.

7 hours ago Reply

@nikhild23 @herring1967 Obviously it's not him. He was eaten by a raptor.

7 hours ago Reply

Does anyone write letters any more? I like to send copious numbers of postcards, but find time for few letters. Shame. http://t.co/m7mnMd00

7 hours ago Reply

Did SAF put night nurse into the #mufc half time orange juice?

11 hours ago Reply

@manchester1 really? I didn't know that. Which version? Nat king cole?

11 hours ago Reply

@graemelambert i've often thought that fines should be income based e.g. 10% of weekly income rather than a set amount. Maybe impossible.

11 hours ago Reply

How much cheaper would my sky bill be if super sunday started at 15.59 and they got rid of the ludicrous build-up hyperbole?

13 hours ago Reply

Why is #superbowl xlvi not superbowl 46? Why the roman numerals?No problem with them,just seems a bit odd. Wonder if superbowl 50 will be L?

13 hours ago Reply

@OfficialMR2 What's the right way to say your name? Meeker? Micker? Myker? RT this and the answer and put thousands of minds at ease!

13 hours ago Reply

There is a chance, a growing chance, that i may not get dressed at all today. My ancient ancestors toiled in caves and hunted food for this.

13 hours ago Reply

Just discovered that there's another ACON in just one year's time! The toures will barely be home!

14 hours ago Reply

Not only are #mcfc unlucky to have the toures away for the ACON, but doubly so cos their country didn't get immediately knocked out #dembaba

14 hours ago Reply

#songifindmyselfrandomlysinging A Nightingale Sang In Berkeley Square.

14 hours ago Reply

@OfficialMR2 You can win. As a person in the public eye you have more influence than 99% of others. Say what you want but in the right way.

15 hours ago Reply

I can name every FA cup winner and runner up 1981-96, but very patchy 96-11. Is that cos i was younger or cos the FA cup is less valued?

15 hours ago Reply

@OfficialMR2 racism needs comments by everyone disgusted by it, not just the victims. Comments by the horrified bystanders are powerful too.

15 hours ago Reply

@OfficialMR2 great comments on the superbowl the other day micah. When did you play professional american football?

15 hours ago Reply

Administration